Connect with us


Nikki Catsouras Photographs Controversy – Insidegistblog



The Nikki Catsouras images controversy revolves round leaked images of Nicole “Nikki” Catsouras (March 4, 1988 – October 31, 2006), who died on the age of 18 in a excessive-velocity automobile crash after shedding management of her father’s Porsche 911 Carrera and hitting with a toll sales space in Lake Forest, California.

Photographs of Catsouras’ scarred physique have been printed on the web, prompting her household to file a lawsuit for the ensuing sorrow.

Unintentional circumstances

Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy

Catsouras and her mother and father ate lunch collectively on October 31, 2006, at their house in Ladera Ranch, California. Her father, Christos Catsouras, then left for work, leaving her mom, Lesli, at house.

Her mom seen Catsouras reversing out of the driveway in Christos’ Porsche 911 Carrera, which she was not allowed to drive. Lesli contacted her husband, and he began driving round in search of his daughter.

READ ALSO: Women Whatsapp Numbers (1000+ Whatsapp Numbers Accessible)

Whereas doing so, he supposedly dialed 9-1-1 minutes earlier than the collision and was positioned on maintain. The dispatcher notified him concerning the accident after he was launched from maintain.


At round 1:38 p.m., Catsouras was happening 241 Toll Street in Lake Forest when she collided with a Honda Civic that she was trying to go on the fitting at over 100 miles per hour (160 km/h).

The Porsche smashed into an unmanned concrete toll sales space close to the Alton Parkway intersection after crossing the highway’s broad center, which lacks a bodily barrier on that stretch.

Catsouras was slain immediately. Toxicological examinations indicated residues of cocaine however no alcohol in Catsouras’ physique.

Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy

Leaked images

In accordance with Newsweek, the Catsoura’s “accident was so grotesque the coroner wouldn’t enable her mother and father to establish their daughter’s physique”.

Photographs of the scene have been taken by California Freeway Patrol (CHP) officers as a part of normal deadly visitors collision procedures. These images have been forwarded to colleagues and leaked onto the Web.

Two CHP staff, Aaron Reich, and Thomas O’Donnell, admitted to releasing the pictures in violation of CHP coverage.

O’Donnell acknowledged in interviews that he solely despatched the photographs to his personal e-mail account for viewing at a later time, whereas Reich acknowledged that he had forwarded the photographs to 4 different folks. Catsouras’ mother and father found the pictures posted on-line.

The images had gained a lot consideration, together with a pretend MySpace tribute web site that contained hyperlinks to the pictures.

Folks anonymously e-mailed copies of the photographs to the Catsouras household with deceptive topic headers, in a single case captioning the picture despatched to the daddy with the phrases “Woohoo Daddy! Hey Daddy, I’m nonetheless alive.”

This led the Catsouras household to withdraw from Web use and, involved that their youngest daughter is perhaps taunted by the pictures, to start homeschooling her.

The web harassment features of the case have been lined by Werner Herzog in his 2016 documentary Lo and Behold, Reveries of the Related World.

Authorized motion by the household

Within the Superior Courtroom of California for Orange County, the Catsouras household sued the California Freeway Patrol and the 2 dispatch supervisors answerable for leaking the pictures.

Initially, a decide dominated that the household’s authorized lawsuit towards the CHP for releasing the pictures could possibly be pursued.

After establishing that the 2 dispatch supervisors had damaged departmental guidelines, the CHP issued a proper apology and took motion to stop comparable conditions sooner or later.

O’Donnell was suspended with out pay for 25 days, and Reich resigned quickly after for “unrelated causes,” in accordance with his counsel.

After Reich and O’Donnell have been eliminated as defendants and the defendants filed for abstract judgment, Decide Steven L.

Perk dismissed the motion towards the California Freeway Patrol. Decide Perk determined that the 2 had no obligation for safeguarding the Catsouras household’s privateness, basically placing a cease to the lawsuit.

In March 2008, the superior courtroom decide who rejected the case acknowledged that, whereas the dispatchers’ habits was “totally reprehensible,” there was no statute that made it illegal.

The CHP submitted “stop and desist” warnings to web sites in an try to take away the photographs from the Web. The Catsouras household tried to erase the pictures with the assistance of Fame Defender however to no avail.

The group estimated that it had persuaded 2,500 web sites to take away the pictures, however admitted that full removing from the web could be unimaginable.

Though the media was sympathetic to the mother and father’ struggling, lawyer and blogger Ted Frank argued that “the Streisand impact has resulted in way more dissemination of the grotesque photographs.”

The California Courtroom of Attraction for the Fourth District reversed Decide Perk’s grant of abstract judgment on February 1, 2010, ruling that the Catsouras household did have the flexibility to sue the defendants for negligence and intentional infliction of psychological misery.

The courtroom described O’Donnell and Reich’s habits as “vulgar” and “morally poor,” saying:

The CHP is answerable for defending and serving the general public. It goes towards that expectation for the CHP to trigger us injury by making the ravaged stays of our family members the goal of Web sensationalism…

O’Donnell and Reich owed the plaintiffs a accountability to not use CHP-acquired proof in a means that might trigger them critical emotional misery.

The California Courtroom of Attraction for the Fourth District concluded on Could 25, 2011, that Aaron Reich had failed to determine that e-mailing the pictures is protected by the First Modification.

Reich acknowledged that he e-mailed the pictures with an anti-drunk driving message as a result of he e-mailed the pictures with an anti-drunk driving message, regardless of Catsouras’ postmortem examination indicating a blood alcohol focus of zero.

“Any editorial feedback that Reich might have made with respect to the pictures are usually not earlier than us,” wrote the three-decide panel that heard Reich’s attraction. In brief, there isn’t a proof that the e-mails have been despatched to speak about drunk driving presently.”

The justices questioned whether or not the recipients nonetheless retained the e-mails, however Reich’s lawyer conceded that that they had not investigated this.

On January 30, 2012, the CHP reached a settlement with the Catsouras household, underneath which the household acquired round $2.37 million in damages. CHP spokeswoman Fran Clader commented: “No sum of money can compensate for the ache the Catsouras household has suffered.

We’ve got reached a decision with the household to avoid wasting substantial prices of continued litigation and a jury trial. It’s our hope that with this authorized subject resolved, the Catsouras household can obtain some closure.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Get Daily Updates Here